![]() Set in the late 1800s, it provides players with the virtual experience of attending a wizarding school, including riding brooms, mixing potions, and casting spells. After all, Jeff Bezos isn’t posting on Twitter about how much he grudges paying Amazon employees or allowing them bathroom breaks maybe it’s easier to support the villains of the world who stay silent.Gamers, especially those who are also fans of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, have been looking forward to this day for several years: the release of the long-awaited "Hogwarts Legacy" immersive, open-world role-playing game. Perhaps it’s the fact that Rowling has made herself, as an individual, so proudly and publicly aligned to this cause that has fans conflicted. If Harry Potter fans want to enjoy the magic of the wizarding world, they simply should do so what’s the difference between sending money to Rowling, over someone like Jeff Bezos? Disney’s complicity in Florida’s “Don't Say Gay” bill is just as repugnant as Rowling’s “activism,” yet fans aren’t considering boycotting all things Disney. Refusing to buy a video game is not activism - it’s not even close. Concerned fans have as much chance of cancelling Star Wars as they do Harry Potter. ![]() Both concerns are irrelevant, as the developers have already been paid, and Rowling is the wealthiest author on the planet - fans can’t make a dent in her pile of golden galleons, and Harry Potter is far too popular to kill with collective disinterest, especially in our era of reboots and retreads, where even niche, cult classics are endlessly resurrected for consumption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |